To be able to control the spread of AFB, it is important to understand how the disease is transferred between colonies. A number of possible means of spread have been suggested by beekeepers. These include:
Obviously, large numbers of spores are usually required to initiate an AFB infection. So probably the best way to assess the importance of the various means of spread is to compare their relative ability to transfer large numbers of spores from one colony to another.
By far the most common causes of AFB spread are beekeeping management practices. The most significant of these are:
Drift of bees from AFB hives to healthy hives is also not an important factor. Such things as hive tools, smokers and gloves, as well as the soil in front of hives, foundation, and queen bees, are of little consequence as sources of spread of the disease.
A trial was conducted to determine the importance of wet honey supers in the spread of AFB.16 Twenty supers of honey were collected from colonies with light AFB infections. Most of the supers came from colonies with less than 5 larvae/pupae exhibiting clinical AFB symptoms. These infections are of the type a beekeeper might miss.
The honey was extracted and the supers and frames put onto 20 AFB-free colonies the next spring. The 20 colonies were placed in an apiary with a further 20 colonies that did not receive such supers.
There were no obvious symptoms of robbing when the supers were placed on the colonies. However, samples of bees taken from each hive two days later all tested positive for AFB spores, including those from the colonies that did not receive AFB supers. Four (20%) of the colonies that didn't receive wet supers, and 9 (45%) of the colonies given infected honey supers, developed AFB infections.
Extracted honey supers are probably the major factor in the spread of AFB in New Zealand. Because this is the case, the proper inspection of hives when the honey is taken off, and the effective control of the subsequent movement of those supers within a beekeeping outfit, are essential parts of any programme to control the spread of the disease.
Unfortunately, transferring a frame of brood from an AFB-infected hive to a clean colony is a very effective way of spreading AFB. To put it in context, a colony may need to be fed 5 million AFB spores to become infected. However, one diseased larvae or pupae can contain 2,500 million spores, or 500 times the number required to initiate an infection.
If a frame of brood has 50 or more diseased larvae/pupae, and the house bees come into contact with large numbers of spores in removing the dead brood, the chances of sufficient spores being fed to a healthy larva to set off a new infection are greatly enhanced.
Next to extracted honey supers, the transferring of brood frames is probably the most common way AFB is spread between colonies in New Zealand.
Researchers at Ruakura were presented with a graphic case of the spread of AFB through robbing several years ago. A truckload of 80 colonies was returned from kiwifruit pollination and put into a dump site. Twenty of the colonies were moved to another apiary site within a couple of days. A further 20 were removed from the dump site to another apiary two weeks later. Of the 40 colonies that remained at the dump site, 88% had to be destroyed over the following 3 months because they had contracted AFB. However, none of the first 20 hives that were removed developed the disease, while 80% of the 20 colonies that were removed two weeks later had to be destroyed.
At some time between the moving of the first group of hives and the second group two weeks later, 85% of the colonies at the dumpsite contracted AFB. The only reasonable explanation was that a large number of the colonies left on the site had robbed an infected hive or a supply of infected honey. Unfortunately, the source of the infection was never found.
This example illustrates the dramatic disease-producing effects that can result from robbing. There are also, however, a number of anecdotal reports of diseased colonies being robbed out without the remainder of the colonies in the apiary becoming infected. Possible reasons for this lack of disease spread include spore levels in the other colonies never getting high enough to create an infection, or the robbing bees coming from a different apiary.
In some cases, it may be a feral colony that is robbed, although it can only be guessed how frequently this occurs. A New Zealand survey indicates that although feral colonies occasionally have infections of AFB, generally they do not.17
The drifting of bees between colonies is often mentioned as a major factor in the spread of AFB. Beekeepers cite examples where if one colony develops AFB, the one next to it will also develop AFB. However, there are many more examples where this does not happen, so coincidence cannot be ruled out.
The hive next to a colony infected with AFB will usually be the next one worked by the beekeeper, and if hive parts are intentionally or inadvertently moved between colonies, they are most likely to end up in the hive next to the one with AFB. It is therefore very difficult to be sure whether a colony developed AFB through drift or from other means.
Trials have been conducted to determine whether bees drifting from colonies with low level AFB infections (less than 50 larvae/pupae exhibiting disease symptoms) are likely to spread AFB.18 Colonies with low level infections are the kind that a beekeeper is most likely to miss.
A total of 24 pairs of colonies were set up, each pair consisting of one hive with a light AFB infection and one uninfected colony. The colonies in each pair were facing the same way and positioned as close together as possible in order to maximise the level of drift.
When the level of drift between the colonies was checked, it was estimated that the equivalent of 50% of the bees had swapped colonies over a 20 day period. However, this may have been due to a smaller number of bees moving backwards and forwards between hives, rather than a total of 50% of the bees swapping colonies.
The pairs of colonies were together for a total time of 7 years (an average of 103 days for each pair). Only 2 of the non-infected control colonies developed AFB. Both hives developed AFB at the same time that 12 other hives in 2 apiaries involved in another experiment close by also developed AFB. It is possible that the infection in these 2 non-infected colonies could have been due to robbing.
What is obvious, however, is that since only 8% of the control colonies developed AFB, bees drifting from colonies with light AFB infections cannot be considered to be a major factor in the spread of AFB. Whether the same can be said for drift from colonies with heavy infections is unknown.
Even if drift is not an important means of spread of AFB, care should still be taken to reduce it to a minimum, since excessive drifting can affect honey production. Three simple methods are effective in reducing drifting between hives.19 These are:
Package bees are a broodless nucleus colony, comprised of a caged queen and an artificial swarm of bees. Package bees can be shipped long distances, and then installed into hives with empty comb in order to start new honey bee colonies. Although package bees contain no brood, they have been shown to be capable of carrying sufficient spores to produce an AFB infection once the bees begin producing brood in the new hive.21
The honey extractor is also unlikely to be a major factor. Infected honey may be transferred between frames during the extracting process. However, the amount will be insignificant compared to the amount contained on a wet super coming directly from an AFB infected hive.
Nevertheless, beekeepers should still take precautions to ensure that their gloves, hive tools and extractors are not a factor at all, and this is preferable to a total lack of beekeeping equipment hygiene.
Many beekeepers have heard stories about a new hive developing AFB after it has been placed in the same position in an apiary as a previously removed AFB hive. The new infection is usually blamed on the contamination of soil in front of the hive with AFB spores.
Research has shown, however, that soil is unlikely to be a source of AFB infection. One study looked for spores in the front of AFB infected colonies, but was unable to find any at all. The study demonstrated that rain water quickly leached the spores from the soil surface.24
Honey taken directly from an AFB hive was found to contain the highest concentration of spores of any hive product (24.3 million spores/g). Pollen pellets produced by AFB hives were also shown to contain large numbers of spores (4.5 million spores/g), although not as high a concentration as either honey or cappings wax.27
If fed to a colony, both honey and pollen taken from a diseased hive can be a major source of AFB infection.
Home NZ Bkpg Bee Diseases Organisation Information Contacts
, webmaster of the site...